top of page

Planar Headphones Sound Reality 

Blog Banner 1680x945 px.jpeg

History of creation

My acquaintance with planar headphones began with the purchase back in 1985 Electronica TDC-5М. At that time, they were one of the best in terms of sound quality in the post-Soviet space; and their design was completely copied from the Yamaha YH-1000 headphones. Then, compared to everything else that could be purchased, it was something fantastic in terms of sound!

 

Many years have passed, but planar headphones still have a number of advantages over the dynamic ones. Despite the significant development of both types of drivers (dynamic and planar), the audience of connoisseurs of high-resolution sound from planar headphones is constantly growing.

I returned to the topic of planar headphones and to listening to music on headphones, in general, a while ago, in response to the demands of my clients. To get the desired result, I had to seriously immerse into the topic so to understand the specifics of all components and their compatibility. And the goal was to reach the highest sound resolution along with the most comfortable fit of the headphones on the head.

I wasn't required to "reinvent the wheel." It was enough to think of the essential components that determine the driver's capacity to reproduce the most realistic audio picture:

  1. Membrane weight. Previously, membranes were made from Kapton, now they are made from Mylar. Mylar is lighter, thinner and more elastic, so it can have a greater amplitude of the membrane shift.

  2. Membrane area: the larger the better. The larger the membrane area, the greater the sensitivity of the driver. Also with a larger membrane area, the frequency range can be significantly expanded in the low-frequency zone.

  3. Interaction of magnetic fluxes of a 'permanent magnet' and an alternating electromagnetic field formed by the inductance of a conductor on the surface of the membrane. The better the interaction, the higher the output efficiency of the driver. And this is determined only by the power of the installed magnets and the density of the tracks on the surface of the membrane.

The most specific thing in the production of planar drivers is the production of membranes with applied current-carrying conductors. The most effective material for current-carrying paths is thin aluminum foil. There are several unique people here in Ukraine who have managed to produce quite good membranes with tracks applied to them almost at home.

 

However, after studying the topic further, I was able to find a manufacturer who has good industrial equipment and who can produce much more high-tech membranes with conductors on the surface, according to the technical specifications provided.

This became the starting point for bringing to life some of my technical and creative ideas for building planar headphones of my own design.

Підхід до реалізації

Для виготовлення навушників Sound Reality я використовую фабричні корпуси з наголів'ям, котрі зручно сидять на вухах, добре регулюються за висотою, мають достатньо великі та еластичні змінні амбушюри.

 

Динамічні навушники Sound Reality виготовляються у так званих "відкритих" і "закритих" акустичних оформленнях корпусів, оскільки і одні, і другі мають свої переваги та недоліки, і вибір слухача завжди є набором компромісів 

В навушниках відкритого типу одною стороною випромінювач грає у вухо слухачу, а інша сторона випромінювача відкрита до навколишнього середовища.

  • Переваги: "відкритіше", більш прозоре та повітряне звучання.

  • Недоліки: по-перше, сильніше чутно оточуючу слухача шумову складову; а по-друге, люди навколо чують музику майже так само гучно, як і сам її слухач у навушниках

В навушниках закритого типу зовнішня сторона випромінювача закрита від навколишнього середовища.

  • У порівнянні з "відкритими" навушниками, "закриті" мають дещо глухіше звучання, але всі партії інструментів, які домінують у НЧ діапазоні, звучать більш «зібрано та скорострільно». Особливо яскраво це проявляється в формуванні образів ударних інструментів, бас-гітари, контрабасу - ви чуєте чіткіший удар, краще відчуваєте настрій музиканта, з якою силою він б'є по барабану чи щипає струну.

  • Ще одна перевага навушників закритого типу - це ізольованість звукокого поля, що створюється для слухача, від оточуючого середовища. Слухач не чує тих шумів, котрі його оточують. А оточуючі не чують того, що слухає він. 

При виготовленні динаміків до навушників я користуюся тими ж принципами, що й при модернізації динаміків до стаціонарних домашніх аудіосистем Sound Reality. 

Також я приділяю особливу увагу виготовленню кабелів, і всі моделі навушників Sound Reality, як динамічні, так і планарні, найкраще розкриваються з моїми ж авторськими кабелями.

The range

Duet

Resistance: 100 ohm

Membrane weight: 56 mg

Sensitivity: 100 dB

Weight: 319 g

 

The first model in the range. Dense filling the surface of the membrane with current-carrying tracks allows to achieve a higher resolution of this model compared to the well-known headphones "HiFiman Ananda"

Trio

Resistance: 470 ohm

Membrane weight: 56 mg

Sensitivity: 100 dB

Weight: 319 g

 

Filling the membrane with tracks is denser vs. the 'Duet'. The section of the tracks decreases as their number increases. Thus, the effect of the so-called 'wave' mode of membrane operation is achieved more efficiently than in the 'Duet'

Orchestra

Resistance: 1000 ohm

Membrane weight: 56 mg

Sensitivity: 103 dB

Weight: 319 g

 

The area of the membrane filled with tracks is significantly larger. Moreover, the weight of the membrane is the same as that of the two previous models. Although the length of the track has almost doubled, the section of the track has been reduced. Magnetic system used is of maximum possible reinforced type

When testing this model, my wife said: "Enough experiments! I'm already getting scared..."

But I still have a few ideas to implement :) Maybe later, when...

Orchestra

Resistance: 1000 ohm

Membrane weight: 56 mg

Sensitivity: 103 dB

Weight: 319 g

 

The area of the membrane filled with tracks is significantly larger. Moreover, the weight of the membrane is the same as that of the two previous models. Although the length of the track has almost doubled, the section of the track has been reduced. Magnetic system used is of maximum possible reinforced type

When testing this model, my wife said: "Enough experiments! I'm already getting scared..."

But I still have a few ideas to implement :) Maybe later, when...

bottom of page